NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundThe increasing ageing population has led to an increase in the prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, as yet, there are no simple biomarkers to predict the onset of such diseases. Recently, VGF and its peptides have been highlighted in neurodegenerative diseases. VGF (non-acronymic) is a polypeptide induced in PC12 cells by neurotrophic factors.ObjectiveThis systematic review aimed to determine whether VGF and/or its derived peptides can be used as biomarkers for the diagnosis of ALS, PD, and AD with specific attention to (1) the levels of VGF and/or its derived peptides, (2) amyloid-beta, (3) dopamine, and (4) cognitive score.MethodologyA search was undertaken in the Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for observational studies. Publications that assessed the level of VGF and/or its derived peptides among people with neurodegenerative diseases and compared them with healthy people were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Quality Assessment Tool.ResultA search of the databases yielded 834 studies, of which, eight observational studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 673 participants (51.7% males) aged >18 years. Seven studies showed significant decreases in VGF and its derived peptides in adults with AD, PD, and ALS compared to healthy controls (pp>0.05). Furthermore, only one study reported that VGF levels were positively correlated with those of tissue dopamine but not with Aβ1-42, and low levels of VGF were associated to cognitive deficits.ConclusionThe use of VGF and its derivatives for the diagnosis of PD, ALS, AD remains unclear, so further investigation of the role of VGF in neurodegenerative diseases and pathophysiology is needed to provide new insights.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.