SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Meta-analysis of the relations between gut microbiota and pathogens and Parkinson's disease.

Adv Clin Exp Med · 2023-06-01

DOI: 10.17219/acem/157193PMID: 36881358

Check source for accessMeta-Analysis; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundThe motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) are commonly preceded by gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. The enteric nervous system (ENS) has also been reported to exhibit neuropathological characteristics of PD.ObjectivesTo evaluate the relationship between the incidence of parkinsonism and alteration in gut microbiota and pathogens.Material and methodsStudies in different languages that evaluate the relationship between gut microorganisms and PD were included into this meta-analysis. The outcomes of these studies were analyzed using a random effects model; it was also used to calculate the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) in order to quantify the impact of different rehabilitation techniques on clinical parameters. Dichotomous and continuous models were used for the analysis of extracted data.ResultsA total of 28 studies were included in our analysis. The analysis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth showed a significant correlation with Parkinson's subjects compared with controls (p ConclusionParkinson's subjects showed a higher degree of alteration of gut microbiota and pathogens compared with normal human subjects. Future multicenter randomized trials are needed.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.