SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

MAPKAPK2, a potential dynamic network biomarker of α-synuclein prior to its aggregation in PD patients.

NPJ Parkinsons Dis · 2023-03-16

DOI: 10.1038/s41531-023-00479-zPMID: 36927756

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

One of the important pathological features of Parkinson's disease (PD) is the pathological aggregation of α-synuclein (α-Syn) in the substantia nigra. Preventing the aggregation of α-Syn has become a potential strategy for treating PD. However, the molecular mechanism of α-Syn aggregation is unclear. In this study, using the dynamic network biomarker (DNB) method, we first identified the critical time point when α-Syn undergoes pathological aggregation based on a SH-SY5Y cell model and found that DNB genes encode transcription factors that regulated target genes that were differentially expressed. Interestingly, we found that these DNB genes and their neighbouring genes were significantly enriched in the cellular senescence pathway and thus proposed that the DNB genes HSF1 and MAPKAPK2 regulate the expression of the neighbouring gene SERPINE1. Notably, in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data obtained from substantia nigra, prefrontal cortex and peripheral blood samples, the expression level of MAPKAPK2 was significantly higher in PD patients than in healthy people, suggesting that MAPKAPK2 has potential as an early diagnostic biomarker of diseases related to pathological aggregation of α-Syn, such as PD. These findings provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying the pathological aggregation of α-Syn.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.