SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Gene-wide significant association analyses of <i>DNMT1</i> genetic variants with Parkinson's disease.

Front Genet · 2023-03-06

DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1112388PMID: 36950137

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background: DNA methylation plays an important role in Parkinson's disease (PD) pathogenesis. DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) is critical for maintaining DNA methylation in mammals. The link between DNMT1 polymorphisms and PD remains elusive. Methods: The DNMT1 gene contained a total of 28 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Four representing tag-SNPs (rs16999593, rs2162560, rs11880553, and rs9305012) were identified and genotyped in a Han Chinese population comprising 712 PD patients and 696 controls. Association analyses were performed at gene-wide significance (p -3). Results: Rs9305012, but not the other 3 tag-SNPs, was gene-wide significantly associated with PD risk (p = 0.8 × 10-3). The rs9305012/C was a protective allele against PD (p = 1.5 × 10-3, OR 0.786, 95% CI 0.677-0.912). No significant association was observed in individual genders or PD subtypes. Haplotypes of the 4 tag-SNPs showed a significant overall distribution difference between PD patients and controls (p -4). The 3-allele ACC module in the order of rs2162560, rs11880553, and rs9305012 was the highest-risk haplotype associated with PD (p -4, OR 2.439, 95% CI 1.563-3.704). Rs9305012 displayed certain probability to affect transcription factor binding and target gene expression based on functional annotation analyses. Conclusion: The DNMT1 variant rs9305012 together with its haplotypes may gene-wide significantly modulate PD susceptibility. Our results support a role of DNMT1 in PD pathogenesis and provide novel insights into the genetic connection in between.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.