SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Capturing Differences in the Regulation of LRRK2 Dynamics and Conformational States by Small Molecule Kinase Inhibitors.

ACS Chem Biol · 2023-04-12

DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.2c00868PMID: 37043829

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Mutations in the human leucine rich repeat protein kinase-2 (LRRK2) create risk factors for Parkinson's disease, and pathological functions of LRRK2 are often correlated with aberrant kinase activity. Past research has focused on developing selective LRRK2 kinase inhibitors. In this study, we combined enhanced sampling simulations with HDX-MS to characterize the inhibitor-induced dynamic changes and the allosteric communications within the C-terminal domains of LRRK2, LRRK2RCKW. We find that the binding of MLi-2 (a type I kinase inhibitor) stabilizes a closed kinase conformation and reduces the global dynamics of LRRK2RCKW, leading to a more compact LRRK2RCKW structure. In contrast, the binding of Rebastinib (a type II kinase inhibitor) stabilizes an open kinase conformation, which promotes a more extended LRRK2RCKW structure. By probing the distinct effects of the type I and type II inhibitors, key interdomain interactions are found to regulate the communication between the kinase domain and the GTPase domain. The intermediate states revealed in our simulations facilitate the efforts toward in silico design of allosteric modulators that control LRRK2 conformations and potentially mediate the oligomeric states of LRRK2 and its interactions with other proteins.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.