SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Blood neurofilament light chain in Parkinson's disease.

J Neural Transm (Vienna) · 2023-04-17

DOI: 10.1007/s00702-023-02632-7PMID: 37067597

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; review-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Blood neurofilament light chain (NfL) is an easily accessible, highly sensitive and reliable biomarker for neuroaxonal damage. Currently, its role in Parkinson's disease (PD) remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that blood NfL can distinguish idiopathic PD from atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APS) with high sensitivity and specificity. In cross-sectional studies, some found significant correlations between blood NfL with motor and cognitive function, whereas others did not. In contrast, prospective studies reported very consistent associations between baseline blood NfL with motor progression and cognitive worsening. Amongst PD subtypes, especially postural instability and gait disorder (PIGD) subtype, symptoms and scores are reliably linked with blood NfL. Different non-motor PD comorbidities have also been associated with high blood NfL levels suggesting that the neuroaxonal damage of the autonomic nervous system as well as serotonergic, cholinergic and noradrenergic neurons is quantifiable. Numerous absolute NfL cutoff levels have been suggested in different cohort studies; however, validation across cohorts remains weak. However, age-adjusted percentiles and intra-individual blood NfL changes might represent more valid and consistent parameters compared with absolute NfL concentrations. In summary, blood NfL has the potential as biomarker in PD patients to be used in clinical practice for prediction of disease severity and especially progression.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.