Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundAxial symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) can be debilitating and are often refractory to conventional therapies such as dopamine replacement therapy and deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nuclei (STN).ObjectiveEvaluate the efficacy of bilateral DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus area (PPNa) and investigate structural and physiological correlates of clinical response.MethodsA randomized, double-blind, cross-over clinical trial was employed to evaluate the efficacy of bilateral PPNa-DBS on axial symptoms. Lead positions and neuronal activity were evaluated with respect to clinical response. Connectomic cortical activation profiles were generated based on the volumes of tissue activated.ResultsPPNa-DBS modestly improved (p = 0.057) axial symptoms in the medication-off condition, with greatest positive effects on gait symptoms (p = 0.027). Electrode placements towards the anterior commissure (ρ= 0.912; p = 0.011) or foramen caecum (ρ= 0.853; p = 0.031), near the 50% mark of the ponto-mesencephalic junction, yielded better therapeutic responses. Recording trajectories of patients with better therapeutic responses (i.e., more anterior electrode placements) had neurons with lower firing-rates (p = 0.003) and higher burst indexes (p = 0.007). Structural connectomic profiles implicated activation of fibers of the posterior parietal lobule which is involved in orienting behavior and locomotion.ConclusionBilateral PPNa-DBS influenced gait symptoms in patients with PD. Anatomical and physiological information may aid in localization of a favorable stimulation target.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.