NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Objective.The coupling between the beta (13-30 Hz) phase and low gamma (50-100 Hz) amplitude in the motor cortex is thought to regulate motor performance. Abnormal phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) of beta-low gamma (β-low-γPAC) is associated with motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. However, the causal relationship betweenβ-low-γPAC and motor performance in healthy subjects is unknown. We hypothesized that healthy subjects could change the strength of theβ-low-γPAC in the resting state by neurofeedback training (NFT) to control theβ-low-γPAC, such that the motor performance changes in accordance with the changes inβ-low-γPAC in the resting state.Approach.We developed an NFT to control the strength of theβ-low-γPAC in the motor cortex, which was evaluated by magnetoencephalography (MEG) using a current source estimation technique. Twenty subjects were enrolled in a double-blind randomized crossover trial to test the feasibility of the MEG NFT. In the NFT for 2 d, the subjects were instructed to reduce the size of a black circle whose radius was proportional (down-training) or inversely proportional (up-training) to the strength of theβ-low-γPAC. The reaction times (RTs) to press a button according to some cues were evaluated before and after training. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03837548) and UMIN-CTR (UMIN000032937).Main results.Theβ-low-γPAC during the resting state was significantly decreased after down-training, although not significantly after up-training. RTs tended to decrease after both trainings, however the differences were not statistically significant. There was no significant correlation between the changes inβ-low-γPAC during rest and RTs.Significance.The proposed MEG NFT was demonstrated to change theβ-low-γPAC of the motor cortex in healthy subjects. However, a relationship between PAC and RT has not yet been demonstrated.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.