SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Interaction and Redox Chemistry between Iron, Dopamine, and Alpha-Synuclein C-Terminal Peptides.

Antioxidants (Basel) · 2023-03-24

DOI: 10.3390/antiox12040791PMID: 37107166

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

α-Synuclein (αS), dopamine (DA), and iron have a crucial role in the etiology of Parkinson's disease. The present study aims to investigate the interplay between these factors by analyzing the DA/iron interaction and how it is affected by the presence of the C-terminal fragment of αS (Ac-αS119-132) that represents the iron-binding domain. At high DA:Fe molar ratios, the formation of the [FeIII(DA)2]- complex prevents the interaction with αS peptides, whereas, at lower DA:Fe molar ratios, the peptide is able to compete with one of the two coordinated DA molecules. This interaction is also confirmed by HPLC-MS analysis of the post-translational modifications of the peptide, where oxidized αS is observed through an inner-sphere mechanism. Moreover, the presence of phosphate groups in Ser129 (Ac-αSpS119-132) and both Ser129 and Tyr125 (Ac-αSpYpS119-132) increases the affinity for iron(III) and decreases the DA oxidation rate, suggesting that this post-translational modification may assume a crucial role for the αS aggregation process. Finally, αS interaction with cellular membranes is another key aspect for αS physiology. Our data show that the presence of a membrane-like environment induced an enhanced peptide effect over both the DA oxidation and the [FeIII(DA)2]- complex formation and decomposition.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.