SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Parkinson's Disease and the Cardiac Cycle: A Rapid Literature Review and Case Series.

Life (Basel) · 2023-04-13

DOI: 10.3390/life13041003PMID: 37109530

Open accessbrief-report; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background and objectivesCardiac function in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) is not well understood. We conducted a review of the literature to summarize all available data on the cardiac cycle in patients with PD and followed up the review with a case series to describe the cardiac cycle timing intervals in this patient population.MethodsUsing the search terms ("Cardiac cycle" OR "echocardiography" OR "LVET" OR "IVCT" OR "IVRT" OR "LVEF" OR "Systolic Dysfunction" OR "Diastolic Dysfunction") AND ("Parkinson's Disease"), 514 studies were found with 19 included in the review.ResultsStudies focused on the impact of medication, the presence of autonomic dysfunction, and resting-state, descriptive observational studies which considered the cardiac cycle. While inconsistent, the evidence suggests that patients with PD have some systolic dysfunction, with recent research implying the presence of subclinical systolic dysfunction. From the case series, 13 participants with PD were included and collected cardiac data daily for 6 weeks. Heart rate was consistent on a weekly basis at 67-71 bpm. Mean week-by-week cardiac parameters were also consistent with the systolic time interval at 332-348 ms, isovolumic relaxation time at 92-96 ms, and isovolumic contraction time at 34-36 ms.ConclusionThese timing intervals add valuable normative values for this patient population and the review of the literature suggests that more research is required to better understand cardiac cycle timing intervals in patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.