NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
PurposeThe benefit from attenuation and scatter correction (ASC) of dopamine transporter (DAT)-SPECT for the detection of nigrostriatal degeneration in clinical routine is still a matter of debate. The current study evaluated the impact of ASC on visual interpretation and semi-quantitative analysis of DAT-SPECT in a large patient sample.MethodsOne thousand seven hundred forty consecutive DAT-SPECT with 123I-FP-CIT from clinical routine were included retrospectively. SPECT images were reconstructed iteratively without and with ASC. Attenuation correction was based on uniform attenuation maps, scatter correction on simulation. All SPECT images were categorized with respect to the presence versus the absence of Parkinson-typical reduction of striatal 123I-FP-CIT uptake by three independent readers. Image reading was performed twice to assess intra-reader variability. The specific 123I-FP-CIT binding ratio (SBR) was used for automatic categorization, separately with and without ASC.ResultsThe mean proportion of cases with discrepant categorization by the same reader between the two reading sessions was practically the same without and with ASC, about 2.2%. The proportion of DAT-SPECT with discrepant categorization without versus with ASC by the same reader was 1.66% ± 0.50% (1.09-1.95%), not exceeding the benchmark of 2.2% from intra-reader variability. This also applied to automatic categorization of the DAT-SPECT images based on the putamen SBR (1.78% discrepant cases between without versus with ASC).ConclusionGiven the large sample size, the current findings provide strong evidence against a relevant impact of ASC with uniform attenuation and simulation-based scatter correction on the clinical utility of DAT-SPECT to detect nigrostriatal degeneration in patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonian syndrome.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.