SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Blood transcriptomic signatures associated with molecular changes in the brain and clinical outcomes in Parkinson's disease.

Nat Commun · 2023-07-05

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39652-6PMID: 37407548

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The ability to use blood to predict the outcomes of Parkinson's disease, including disease progression and cognitive and motor complications, would be of significant clinical value. We undertook bulk RNA sequencing from the caudate and putamen of postmortem Parkinson's disease (n = 35) and control (n = 40) striatum, and compared molecular profiles with clinical features and bulk RNA sequencing data obtained from antemortem peripheral blood. Cognitive and motor complications of Parkinson's disease were associated with molecular changes in the caudate (stress response) and putamen (endothelial pathways) respectively. Later and earlier-onset Parkinson's disease were molecularly distinct, and disease duration was associated with changes in caudate (oligodendrocyte development) and putamen (cellular senescence), respectively. Transcriptome patterns in the postmortem Parkinson's disease brain were also evident in antemortem peripheral blood, and correlated with clinical features of the disease. Together, these findings identify molecular signatures in Parkinson's disease patients' brain and blood of potential pathophysiologic and prognostic importance.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.