SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Impaired aldehyde detoxification exacerbates motor deficits in an alpha-synuclein mouse model of Parkinson's disease.

Brain Behav · 2023-07-14

DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3150PMID: 37452461

Open accessresearch-article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionThe discovery of biogenic aldehydes in the postmortem parkinsonian brain and the ability of these aldehydes to modify and cross-link proteins has called attention to their possible role in Parkinson's disease. For example, many in vitro studies have found that the aldehyde metabolite of dopamine, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde (DOPAL), induces the formation of stable, neurotoxic alpha-synuclein oligomers.MethodsTo study this in vivo, mice deficient in the two aldehyde dehydrogenase enzymes (Aldh1a1 and Aldh2, DKO) primarily responsible for detoxification of DOPAL in the nigrostriatal pathway were crossed with mice that overexpress human wild-type alpha-synuclein. DKO overexpressing human wild-type alpha-synuclein (DKO/ASO) offspring were evaluated for impairment on motor tasks associated with Parkinsonism.ResultsDKO/ASO mice developed severe motor deficits greater than that of mice overexpressing human wild-type alpha-synuclein alone.ConclusionThese results provide evidence to support the idea that biogenic aldehydes such as DOPAL interact with human wild-type alpha-synuclein, directly or indirectly, in vivo to exacerbate locomotor deficits in Parkinson's disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.