SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Recombinant Antibody Fragments for Neurological Disorders: An Update.

Curr Neuropharmacol · 2024-01-01

DOI: 10.2174/1570159x21666230830142554PMID: 37646225

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Recombinant antibody fragments are promising alternatives to full-length immunoglobulins, creating big opportunities for the pharmaceutical industry. Nowadays, antibody fragments such as antigen-binding fragments (Fab), single-chain fragment variable (scFv), single-domain antibodies (sdAbs), and bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are being evaluated as diagnostics or therapeutics in preclinical models and in clinical trials. Immunotherapy approaches, including passive transfer of protective antibodies, have shown therapeutic efficacy in several animal models of Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), Huntington's disease (HD), transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) and multiple sclerosis (MS). There are various antibodies approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating multiple sclerosis and two amyloid beta-specific humanized antibodies, Aducanumab and Lecanemab, for AD. Our previous review summarized data on recombinant antibodies evaluated in pre-clinical models for immunotherapy of neurodegenerative diseases. Here, we explore recent studies in this fascinating research field, give an update on new preventive and therapeutic applications of recombinant antibody fragments for neurological disorders and discuss the potential of antibody fragments for developing novel approaches for crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and targeting cells and molecules of interest in the brain.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.