SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Neurofilament light chain as a mediator between LRRK2 mutation and dementia in Parkinson's disease.

NPJ Parkinsons Dis · 2023-09-12

DOI: 10.1038/s41531-023-00572-3PMID: 37699957

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Elevated neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels have been associated with dementia in idiopathic Parkinson's disease (iPD). To examine the baseline and longitudinal changes in NfL levels in GBA-PD, SNCA-PD, and LRRK2-PD and further investigate the association between these genetic mutations, NfL, and dementia in PD. We analyzed data from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI), including 184 healthy controls (HC) and 617 PD categorized as iPD (n = 381), LRRK2-PD (n = 142), GBA-PD (n = 76) and SNCA-PD (n = 18). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or linear mixed-effect models were used to compare the baseline or dynamic NfL levels between groups. We then explored the relationship between genetic mutations, serum NfL levels, and conversion to dementia using mediation analysis. After adjusting for confounding factors, SNCA-PD exhibited higher baseline serum NfL levels than iPD. Regarding longitudinal changes, SNCA-PD showed the highest increase rate in estimated NfL levels (2.43 pg/mL per year), while LRRK2-PD experienced the slowest increase rate (0.52 pg/mL per year). Mediation analysis indicated that higher estimated NfL level changes were associated with faster cognitive decline (β = 0.591, p = 0.026). Specifically, the relationship between LRRK2 and dementia was mediated by the estimated NfL level change (β = -0.717, p < 0.05). Longitudinal changes in serum NfL levels may serve as a biomarker for cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease. Moreover, compared to iPD, the slower progression of dementia in LRRK2-PD may be partially attributed to a slower increase in NfL levels.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.