Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
ObjectiveThis study was designed to investigate the diagnostic value of plasma SIRT1 levels and whole-brain gray matter (GM) volume in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with cognitive impairment.MethodsAutomated enzymatic analysis was performed to measure plasma SIRT1 levels in 80 healthy controls and 77 PD patients. Motor symptoms and nonmotor symptoms in PD patients were assessed using the corresponding scales. A Siemens MAGNETOM Prisma 3 T MRI scanner was used to acquire images in 35 of 77 PD patients.ResultsPlasma SIRT1 levels in PD patients were lower than those in healthy controls. Plasma SIRT1 levels were negatively correlated with the age, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-III) scores, anxiety, depression, excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), quality of life, and especially cognitive impairment. Thus, it showed that plasma SIRT1 levels were relevant to visuospatial/executive function, memory, and language. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis confirmed that plasma SIRT1 levels had good diagnostic accuracy for PD with anxiety and EDS. Furthermore, plasma SIRT1 levels had a significant positive correlation with GM volume in the whole brain, and ROC analysis confirmed that plasma SIRT1 levels and the total GM volume had good diagnostic accuracy for PD with cognitive impairment.ConclusionsThis study showed that plasma SIRT1 levels were correlated with the nonmotor symptoms of anxiety, depression, EDS, and especially cognitive impairment as well as the total GM volume. Furthermore, the combination of plasma SIRT1 levels and the total GM volume had good diagnostic accuracy for PD with cognitive impairment.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.