SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

SARS-CoV-2 N-protein induces the formation of composite α-synuclein/N-protein fibrils that transform into a strain of α-synuclein fibrils.

Nanoscale · 2023-11-23

DOI: 10.1039/d3nr03556ePMID: 37921451

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The presence of deposits of alpha-synuclein (αS) fibrils in the cells of the brain is a hallmark of several α-synucleinopathies, including Parkinson's disease. As most disease cases are not familial, it is likely that external factors play a role in the disease onset. One of the external factors that may influence the disease onset is viral infection. It has recently been shown in in vitro assays that in the presence of SARS-Cov-2 N-protein, αS fibril formation is faster and proceeds in an unusual two-step aggregation process. Here, we show that faster fibril formation is not due to the SARS-CoV-2 N-protein-catalysed formation of an aggregation-prone nucleus. Instead, aggregation starts with the formation of a population of mixed αS/N-protein fibrils with low affinity for αS. Mixed amyloid fibrils, composed of two different proteins, have not been observed before. After the depletion of N-protein, fibril formation comes to a halt, until a slow transformation into fibrils with characteristics of a pure αS fibril strain occurs. This transformation into a strain of αS fibrils subsequently results in a second phase of fibril growth until a new equilibrium is reached. We hypothesize that this fibril strain transformation may be of relevance in the cell-to-cell spread of the αS pathology and disease onset.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.