SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Update on vascular control of central chemoreceptors.

Exp Physiol · 2023-12-28

DOI: 10.1113/ep091329PMID: 38153366

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

At least four mechanisms have been proposed to elucidate how neurons in the retrotrapezoid (RTN) region sense changes in CO2/H+ to regulate breathing (i.e., function as respiratory chemosensors). These mechanisms include: (1) intrinsic neuronal sensitivity to H+ mediated by TASK-2 and GPR4; (2) paracrine activation of RTN neurons by CO2-responsive astrocytes (via a purinergic mechanism); (3) enhanced excitatory synaptic input or disinhibition; and (4) CO2-induced vascular contraction. Although blood flow can influence tissue CO2/H+ levels, there is limited understanding of how control of vascular tone in central CO2 chemosensitive regions might contribute to respiratory output. In this review, we focus on recent evidence that CO2/H+-induced purinergic-dependent vasoconstriction in the ventral parafacial region near RTN neurons supports respiratory chemoreception. This mechanism appears to be unique to the ventral parafacial region and opposite to other brain regions, including medullary chemosensor regions, where CO2/H+ elicits vasodilatation. We speculate that this mechanism helps to maintain CO2/H+ levels in the vicinity of RTN neurons, thereby maintaining the drive to breathe. Important next steps include determining whether disruption of CO2/H+ vascular reactivity contributes to or can be targeted to improve breathing problems in disease states, such as Parkinson's disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.