SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Modulation of α-synuclein in vitro aggregation kinetics by its alternative splice isoforms.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A · 2024-02-07

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2313465121PMID: 38324572

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The misfolding and aggregation of α-synuclein is linked to a family of neurodegenerative disorders known as synucleinopathies, the most prominent of which is Parkinson's disease (PD). Understanding the aggregation process of α-synuclein from a mechanistic point of view is thus of key importance. SNCA, the gene encoding α-synuclein, comprises six exons and produces various isoforms through alternative splicing. The most abundant isoform is expressed as a 140-amino acid protein (αSyn-140), while three other isoforms, αSyn-126, αSyn-112, and αSyn-98, are generated by skipping exon 3, exon 5, or both exons, respectively. In this study, we performed a detailed biophysical characterization of the aggregation of these four isoforms. We found that αSyn-112 and αSyn-98 exhibit accelerated aggregation kinetics compared to αSyn-140 and form distinct aggregate morphologies, as observed by transmission electron microscopy. Moreover, we observed that the presence of relatively small amounts of αSyn-112 accelerates the aggregation of αSyn-140, significantly reducing the aggregation half-time. These results indicate a potential role of alternative splicing in the pathological aggregation of α-synuclein and provide insights into how this process could be associated with the development of synucleinopathies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.