SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Short-latency afferent inhibition as a biomarker of cholinergic degeneration compared to PET imaging in Parkinson's disease.

Parkinsonism Relat Disord · 2024-02-10

DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.106032PMID: 38364622

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionShort-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) is a relatively cheap and non-invasive method that has been proposed as a cholinergic marker in Parkinson's disease (PD). We aim to verify the clinical feasibility of SAI as a cholinergic marker in PD using positron emission tomography (PET) with the tracer (2R,3R)-5-(2-[18F]fluoroethoxy)benzovesamicol ([18F]FEOBV) as a reference.MethodsWe examined relations between SAI and [18F]FEOBV PET using linear regression analysis, with the primary motor cortex (M1) as primary region of interest. Additionally, we examined relations of both measures with clinical features.Results30 PD patients with varying degrees of cognitive dysfunction and 10 healthy controls (HC) were included in the analysis. SAI was not related to tracer uptake in M1 in the PD group (p = .291) or the HC group (p = .206). We could not replicate the previously published relations between SAI and cholinergic symptoms, such as cognition, psychotic experiences and olfactory function.ConclusionSAI was not related to [18F]FEOBV imaging parameters, nor to clinical measures of cholinergic dysfunction. Therefore, SAI may not be feasible as a clinically applied cholinergic marker in PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.