SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

How Do Molecular Tweezers Bind to Proteins? Lessons from X-ray Crystallography.

Molecules · 2024-04-12

DOI: 10.3390/molecules29081764PMID: 38675584

Open accessresearch-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

To understand the biological relevance and mode of action of artificial protein ligands, crystal structures with their protein targets are essential. Here, we describe and investigate all known crystal structures that contain a so-called "molecular tweezer" or one of its derivatives with an attached natural ligand on the respective target protein. The aromatic ring system of these compounds is able to include lysine and arginine side chains, supported by one or two phosphate groups that are attached to the half-moon-shaped molecule. Due to their marked preference for basic amino acids and the fully reversible binding mode, molecular tweezers are able to counteract pathologic protein aggregation and are currently being developed as disease-modifying therapies against neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. We analyzed the corresponding crystal structures with 14-3-3 proteins in complex with mono- and diphosphate tweezers. Furthermore, we solved crystal structures of two different tweezer variants in complex with the enzyme Δ1-Pyrroline-5-carboxyl-dehydrogenase (P5CDH) and found that the tweezers are bound to a lysine and methionine side chain, respectively. The different binding modes and their implications for affinity and specificity are discussed, as well as the general problems in crystallizing protein complexes with artificial ligands.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.