SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Artificial Intelligence Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease From MRI Scans.

Cureus · 2024-04-23

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58841PMID: 38784299

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor symptoms such as tremors, rigidity, and bradykinesia, affecting approximately 6.1 million people worldwide, according to estimates from the Parkinson's Foundation. Early and accurate diagnosis of PD is crucial for effective management and treatment. In this study, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model capable of distinguishing between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of individuals with PD and those without PD. A total of 442 MRI scans were utilized for training the AI model, comprising 221 scans of individuals diagnosed with PD and 221 scans of healthy controls. The dataset, obtained from a publicly available image dataset on Kaggle.com, was randomly split into three sets: training, validation, and testing, with 80%, 10%, and 10% of the data allocated to each set, respectively. Leveraging Google's Collaboration platform for model training, the AI model achieved exceptional performance, with accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, and F1-score all measuring at high levels. Additionally, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the model was found to be 1, indicating strong discrimination between PD and non-PD cases. This study presents a novel AI model capable of accurately identifying PD from MRI scans with high precision and reliability, offering promise for enhancing early diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies for individuals affected by PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.