Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundMutations in the Leucine Rich Repeat Kinase 2 gene are highly relevant in both sporadic and familial cases of Parkinson's disease. Specific therapies are entering clinical trials but patient stratification remains challenging. Dysregulated microRNA expression levels have been proposed as biomarker candidates in sporadic Parkinson's disease.ObjectiveIn this proof-of concept study we evaluate the potential of extracellular miRNA signatures to identify LRRK2-driven molecular patterns in Parkinson's disease.MethodsWe measured expression levels of 91 miRNAs via RT-qPCR in ten individuals with sporadic Parkinson's disease, ten LRRK2 mutation carriers and eleven healthy controls using both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. We compared miRNA signatures using heatmaps and t-tests. Next, we applied group sorting algorithms and tested sensitivity and specificity of their group predictions.ResultsmiR-29c-3p was differentially expressed between LRRK2 mutation carriers and sporadic cases, with miR-425-5p trending towards significance. Individuals clustered in principal component analysis along mutation status. Group affiliation was predicted with high accuracy in the prediction models (sensitivity up to 89%, specificity up to 70%). miRs-128-3p, 29c-3p, 223-3p, and 424-5p were identified as promising discriminators among all analyses.ConclusionsLRRK2 mutation status impacts the extracellular miRNA signature measured in plasma and separates mutation carriers from sporadic Parkinson's disease patients. Monitoring LRRK2 miRNA signatures could be an interesting approach to test drug efficacy of LRRK2-targeting therapies. In light of small sample size, the suggested approach needs to be validated in larger cohorts.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.