SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Effect of the mGlu<sub>2</sub> positive allosteric modulator biphenyl-indanone A as a monotherapy and as adjunct to a low dose of L-DOPA in the MPTP-lesioned marmoset.

Eur J Neurosci · 2024-06-27

DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16454PMID: 38936819

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Activation of metabotropic glutamate 2 (mGlu2) receptors is a potential novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of parkinsonism. Thus, when administered as monotherapy or as adjunct to a low dose of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), the mGlu2 positive allosteric modulator (PAM) LY-487,379 alleviated parkinsonism in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-lesioned primates. Here, we sought to investigate the effect of biphenyl-indanone A (BINA), a highly selective mGlu2 PAM whose chemical scaffold is unrelated to LY-487,379, to determine if a structurally different mGlu2 PAM would also confer anti-parkinsonian benefit. In monotherapy experiments, MPTP-lesioned marmosets were injected with either vehicle, L-DOPA/benserazide (15/3.75 mg/kg, positive control) or BINA (0.1, 1, 10 mg/kg). In adjunct to a low L-DOPA dose experiments, MPTP-lesioned marmosets were injected with L-DOPA/benserazide (7.5/1.875 mg/kg) in combination with vehicle or BINA (0.1, 1, 10 mg/kg). Parkinsonism, dyskinesia and psychosis-like behaviours (PLBs) were then quantified. When administered alone, BINA 1 and 10 mg/kg decreased parkinsonism severity by ~22% (p 2 positive allosteric modulation elicits anti-parkinsonian effects. That this benefit is not related to a particular chemical scaffold suggests that it may be a class effect rather than the effect of a specific molecule.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.