NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
A non-invasive and non-pharmacological approach is evaluated for the proprioceptive and postural improvement of PD subjects. The authors evaluated the effectiveness of a class I medical device according to EU regulation 745/2017 designed to develop the mechanism of action based on the modulation of action potentials, which occurs in prevalent pathways of the afferent peripheral nervous system efferent in subjects with spasticity. The present observational study, structured in a double-blind randomized manner, therefore, had the main aim of evaluating the ability of the device to improve on the motor and proprioceptive function of PD patients. This study was based on the instrumented gait analysis performed according to the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test procedure, as well as using a fall risk assessment in accordance with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) procedures. This study involved 25 participants in the active group (no placebo) and 25 in the non-active group (placebo), the latter to whom non-functional devices were applied, but in every respect identical to the functional devices applied to the 25 patients in the no placebo group. Data analysis was conducted using statistical methodologies for statistics, the statistical significance of the results for the observed samples and the interdependence between the measured variables. The study of the mechanism of action based on the remodulation of action potentials was preliminary conducted through numerical modeling of the Hodgkin-Huxley axon, modified by introducing the influence of the capacitive device applied in clinical tests into the validated model to target the dielectric properties of materials constituting the passive sensor. The use of the neuromodulation device promises observable improvements in motor function among PD patients, including increased limb mobility and greater postural stability.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.