SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Impact of co-resident health and living alone on risk of hospital admission for people with Parkinson's disease.

Parkinsonism Relat Disord · 2024-08-06

DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.107084PMID: 39121562

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundPeople with Parkinson's Disease (PwP) have a higher rate of hospitalisation compared to the general population. Little is known about the impact of having a co-resident and their health on hospitalisation rates of PwP.MethodsWe utilised Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD data (2010-2015) to identify PwP and co-residents. We classed either the fittest or youngest adult as the primary caregiver in each household. Caregiver health was classified by the Cambridge Multimorbidity Score (CMS), primary care utilisation and prescriptions. We calculated the hospitalisation (elective, emergency) incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for PwP who lived alone compared to those with a caregiver using negative binomial regression, and whether worse caregiver health predicted higher risk of admissions.ResultsWe identified 3254 PwP and 4007 family members. PwP who lived alone were less likely to have an elective admission (0.79; 95 % CI 0.69-0.91) and more likely to have an emergency admission (1.40; 95 % CI 1.70-1.54). Worse caregiver health, as measured by the CMS, was associated with an increased risk of emergency admission (IRR 1.35; 95 % CI 1.17-1.57), but this attenuated and was consistent with chance in the fully adjusted model (1.04; 95 % CI 0.95-1.13). No strong associations were seen between caregiver health and elective admissions.ConclusionPwP who live alone are at increased risk of emergency and less likely to have elective hospital admissions. It is important that health care providers support such people and ensure they receive equitable access to the potential benefits of elective procedures.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.