Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
PurposeChanges in retinal structure and microvasculature are connected to parallel changes in the brain. Two recent studies described machine learning algorithms trained on retinal images and quantitative data that identified Alzheimer's dementia and mild cognitive impairment with high accuracy. Prior studies also demonstrated retinal differences in individuals with PD. Herein, we developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify multimodal retinal imaging from either a Parkinson's disease (PD) or control group.MethodsWe trained a CNN to receive retinal image inputs of optical coherence tomography (OCT) ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness color maps, OCT angiography 6 × 6-mm en face macular images of the superficial capillary plexus, and ultra-widefield (UWF) fundus color and autofluorescence photographs to classify the retinal imaging as PD or control. The model consists of a shared pretrained VGG19 feature extractor and image-specific feature transformations which converge to a single output. Model results were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals for area under the ROC curve (AUC) values.ResultsIn total, 371 eyes of 249 control subjects and 75 eyes of 52 PD subjects were used for training, validation, and testing. Our best CNN variant achieved an AUC of 0.918. UWF color photographs were the most effective imaging input, and GC-IPL thickness maps were the least contributory.ConclusionsUsing retinal images, our pilot CNN was able to identify individuals with PD and serves as a proof of concept to spur the collection of larger imaging datasets needed for clinical-grade algorithms.Translational relevanceDeveloping machine learning models for automated detection of Parkinson's disease from retinal imaging could lead to earlier and more widespread diagnoses.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.