SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunct therapy in the treatment of sleep disorders among patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis.

Front Neurol · 2024-07-31

DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1328911PMID: 39144713

Open accessSystematic Review; systematic-review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) as an adjunct therapy for treating sleep disorders in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).MethodsWe conducted comprehensive searches in eight databases from inception through September 2023, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), and Wanfang Database. The objective was to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating HBOT's effectiveness in alleviating sleep disorder symptoms in PD patients as an adjunct therapy. Literature screening and data extraction were independently executed by the authors. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3 software, and publication bias and sensitivity analyses were assessed using Stata 17.0 software.ResultsSeven RCTs involving 461 participants were included. The findings revealed that the addition of HBOT significantly enhanced sleep efficiency (MD = 15.26, 95% CI [10.89, 19.63], p p p = 0.003), slow-wave sleep (SWS) time (MD = 6.14, 95% CI [3.95, 8.34], p p p p p p p = 0.002), and Hoehn and Yahr grading (H-Y grading) (MD = -0.15, 95% CI [-0.28, -0.01], p = 0.03).ConclusionThe current meta-analysis supports the efficacy of HBOT as an adjunct therapy in managing sleep disorders in PD patients. It is recommended for PD patients experiencing sleep disturbances.Systematic review registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, identifier: CRD42023462201.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.