SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Cocaine-induced Movement Disorder: A Literature Review.

Prague Med Rep · 2024-01-01

DOI: 10.14712/23362936.2024.19PMID: 39171548

Check source for accessReview; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

This study aims to describe movement disorders secondary to cocaine use. To our knowledge, while these presentations have been previously reported in the literature, a comprehensive review has not been published yet. We searched six databases from 1986 to 2022 without language restriction. Case reports, case series, and literature reviews have been analysed to find associations between cocaine use and movement disorders. The present study encompasses epidemiology, clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, and diagnostic challenges of abnormal movements associated with cocaine use. This review highlights the importance of proper initial evaluation and investigation taking into account the broad spectrum of differential diagnoses and exclusion of primary movement disorders. The role of the dopaminergic system in movement disorders is reviewed. Cocaine use is associated with movement disorders such as dystonia, parkinsonism, akathisia, and tics. The complex interaction of multiple factors, including other neurological conditions, such as Tourette syndrome, and additional substances of abuse is discussed. The presentation of these manifestations is often heterogeneous and does not follow a specific pattern. In this way, future research is needed to improve our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms and develop novel drug targets for these disorders. Increased awareness among the general public and policymakers could translate into reduced stigma and improved care.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.