SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

New Perspectives for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease-Associated Gait Impairment: A Systematic Review.

Biomedicines · 2024-08-12

DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12081824PMID: 39200289

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's Disease is a neurodegenerative disorder manifesting itself as a hypokinetic movement impairment with postural instability and gait disturbance. In case of failure and/or limited response, deep brain stimulation has been established as an alternative and effective treatment modality. However, a subset of PD patients with gait impairment represents a therapeutic challenge. A systematic review (2000-2023) was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases to determine the efficacy, stimulation waveform/parameters, spine level, and outcome measures of spinal cord stimulation using different waveforms in PD patients with and without chronic pain. Spinal cord stimulation responsiveness was assessed within the pre-defined follow-up period in three groups (short-term follow-up = 0-3 months; intermediate follow-up = 3-12 months; and long-term follow-up = more than 12 months). In addition, we briefly outline alternative neurostimulation therapies and the most recent developments in closed-loop spinal cord stimulation relevant to PD. In summary, 18 publications and 70 patients from uncontrolled observational trials were included, with low-quality evidence and conflicting findings. First and foremost, the currently available data do not support the use of spinal cord stimulation to treat PD-related gait disorders but have confirmed its usefulness for PD-associated chronic pain.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.