SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Single-domain antibodies and aptamers drive new opportunities for neurodegenerative disease research.

Front Immunol · 2024-08-22

DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1426656PMID: 39238639

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; review-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) in mammals, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), are characterized by the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the central nervous system (CNS). Despite the presence of these pathogenic proteins, the immune response in affected individuals remains notably muted. Traditional immunological strategies, particularly those reliant on monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), face challenges related to tissue penetration, blood-brain barrier (BBB) crossing, and maintaining protein stability. This has led to a burgeoning interest in alternative immunotherapeutic avenues. Notably, single-domain antibodies (or nanobodies) and aptamers have emerged as promising candidates, as their reduced size facilitates high affinity antigen binding and they exhibit superior biophysical stability compared to mAbs. Aptamers, synthetic molecules generated from DNA or RNA ligands, present both rapid production times and cost-effective solutions. Both nanobodies and aptamers exhibit inherent qualities suitable for ND research and therapeutic development. Cross-seeding events must be considered in both traditional and small-molecule-based immunodiagnostic and therapeutic approaches, as well as subsequent neurotoxic impacts and complications beyond protein aggregates. This review delineates the challenges traditional immunological methods pose in ND research and underscores the potential of nanobodies and aptamers in advancing next-generation ND diagnostics and therapeutics.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.