Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundParkinson's disease (PD) is often accompanied by gait disorders and freezing of gait (FoG), disabling symptoms that are resistant to conventional dopamine treatments. Given the cerebellum's connectivity with the motor cortex and basal ganglia, and its implication in PD, combining transcranial direct current stimulation targeting the cerebellum (ctDCS) with physical exercise might improve gait and balance.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel rehabilitation approach that combines noninvasive cerebellar stimulation with motor-cognitive training via an augmented reality treadmill (C-Mill VR+) in individuals with PD and FoG.MethodsSeventeen individuals with PD exhibiting FoG were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. The participants were randomly assigned to a group receiving motor-cognitive training on the C-Mill VR+ with either ctDCS or sham ctDCS. Assessments were conducted pre-intervention (T0), post-intervention (T1) after 10 sessions, and at 4-week follow-up (T2), using various clinical scales. Additionally, C-Mill assessments of postural stability and gait were conducted at T0 and T1.ResultsAlthough no significant time*group interactions were observed for any of the clinical variables measured, some were found in the C-Mill measures. Specifically, right lower limb sway in static conditions, both with eyes open (OAD) and eyes closed (OCD), significantly improved at T1 in the ctDCS group compared with the sham group.ConclusionsC-Mill outcomes indicate that the combined treatment may enhance motor control. Participants who received ctDCS along with augmented reality motor-cognitive training showed better postural stability.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.