SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Microbiota Orchestra in Parkinson's Disease: The Nasal and Oral Maestros.

Biomedicines · 2024-10-22

DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12112417PMID: 39594984

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by the progressive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons, leading to a range of motor and non-motor symptoms.Background/objectivesOver the past decade, studies have identified a potential link between the microbiome and PD pathophysiology. The literature suggests that specific bacterial communities from the gut, oral, and nasal microbiota may be involved in neuroinflammatory processes, which are hallmarks of PD. This review aims to comprehensively analyze the current research on the composition, diversity, and dysbiosis characteristics of the nasal and oral microbiota in PD.MethodsThrough a comprehensive search across scientific databases, we identify twenty original studies investigating the nasal and oral microbiota in PD.ResultsMost of these studies demonstrate the substantial roles of bacterial communities in neuroinflammatory pathways associated with PD progression. They also underscore the influences of microbiota-derived factors on key aspects of PD pathology, including alpha-synuclein aggregation and immune dysregulation.ConclusionsFinally, we discuss the potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications of modulating the nasal and oral microbiota in PD management. This analysis seeks to identify potential avenues for future research in order to clarify the complex relationships between these microorganisms and PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.