SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Value of MRI-visible perivascular spaces in predicting levodopa responsiveness of patients with Parkinson's disease.

Eur J Radiol · 2024-11-22

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111844PMID: 39603008

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

PurposeInter-individual difference in levodopa responsiveness is a challenge for physicians to administer personalized treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Previous studies demonstrated that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible perivascular spaces (PVS) might lead to an incomplete response to levodopa. This study aimed to investigate the association between MRI-visible PVS and levodopa responsiveness in patients with PD.MethodsThis cross-sectional study enrolled a total of 327 patients with PD (median age 64.0[57.0-68.0] years, 180 male) who had undergone high-resolution T2-weighted structural MRI at our hospital between 2019 and 2023. An acute levodopa challenge test was performed to evaluate levodopa responsiveness. The patients were divided into two groups: levodopa responsive (MDS-UPDRS-III reduction ≥ 33 %, n = 274) and irresponsive groups (MDS-UPDRS-III reduction ResultsThere were no significant differences in PVS number, volume fraction, and visual score between the levodopa-responsive and -irresponsive groups. The indicators from quantitative and semi-quantitative analyses of PVS were not found to be independent predictors of levodopa responsiveness. None of the indicators from the quantitative or semi-quantitative analyses of PVS were significantly associated with poor responsiveness to levodopa treatment.ConclusionsMRI-visible PVS are not independently associated with levodopa responsiveness, and their value in predicting levodopa responsiveness in patients with PD is limited.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.