SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Effect of subthalamic and nigral deep brain stimulation on speech and voice in Parkinson's patients.

J Neural Transm (Vienna) · 2024-11-28

DOI: 10.1007/s00702-024-02860-5PMID: 39607456

Open accessresearch-article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Deep brain stimulation can influence the speech and voice quality in Parkinson´s disease (PD). This controlled, randomized, double-blind, cross-over clinical trial was conducted in 15 PD patients with bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) to compare the effects of STN-DBS with combined subthalamic and nigral stimulation (STN + SNr-DBS) and DBS OFF on speech and voice parameters in PD patients. Speech and voice were analyzed subjectively using questionnaires (voice/pronunciation quality VAS, VHI, SHI) and objectively using audio analysis (maximum phonation time, AVQI, mean F0, intonation, syllable rate, reading time). Both stimulation conditions, STN + SNr-DBS and STN-DBS, revealed heterogeneous effects on speech and voice production with a slight beneficial effect on the voice quality of individual patients compared to DBS OFF, but not in the whole group. Small, but not significant effects were seen only in subjective voice quality on the VAS and intonation (both stimulation conditions compared to DBS OFF). No significant changes of the objective speech parameters during the audio analysis could be observed (both stimulation conditions compared to DBS OFF). There were no significant differences between STN + SNr-DBS and STN-DBS in any speech and voice domain. The beneficial effects on speech and voice production are minor in most patients compared to the motor improvements by DBS. Both STN-DBS and STN + SNr-DBS were safe, with comparable effects between both DBS modes, and represent no contraindications from the perspective of the voice specialist.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.