Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
IntroductionThis research aimed to investigate the pathophysiological mechanism of how drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP) affects the integrity of the white matter (WM) fiber microstructure as measured by magnetic resonance diffusion tensor image (DTI) fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD).MethodsWe recruited 17 participants diagnosed with DIP, 20 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, and 16 normal controls (NCs) with a similar age, gender, and years of education. Subsequently, all participants underwent DTI magnetic resonance imaging scanning. To analyze the data, we utilized the software packages Functional MRI of the Brain Centre (FMRIB) Diffusion Toolbox (FDT), developed by the FMRIB laboratory at Oxford University, and tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS).ResultsThe Argentina Hyposmia Rating Scale (AHRS) scores of patients in DIP group were markedly higher than those in PD patients group. Compared with the NC group, the FA values in the genu and body of the corpus callosum (CC), anterior limb of the right internal capsule, bilateral anterior corona radiata, bilateral superior corona radiata, right external capsule, and right superior fronto-occipital fasciculus (could be a part of the anterior internal capsule) were significantly decreased in the DIP group; however, no significant cluster was found in MD.ConclusionsThe present study provides novel insights into the alterations in WM microstructure among DIP patients, suggesting that these methodologies have the potential to aid in the early diagnosis and treatment of DIP.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.