SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

White Matter Microstructure Alteration in Patients with Drug-Induced Parkinsonism: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study with Tract-Based Spatial Statistics.

J Integr Neurosci · 2024-11-01

DOI: 10.31083/j.jin2311202PMID: 39613471

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionThis research aimed to investigate the pathophysiological mechanism of how drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP) affects the integrity of the white matter (WM) fiber microstructure as measured by magnetic resonance diffusion tensor image (DTI) fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD).MethodsWe recruited 17 participants diagnosed with DIP, 20 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, and 16 normal controls (NCs) with a similar age, gender, and years of education. Subsequently, all participants underwent DTI magnetic resonance imaging scanning. To analyze the data, we utilized the software packages Functional MRI of the Brain Centre (FMRIB) Diffusion Toolbox (FDT), developed by the FMRIB laboratory at Oxford University, and tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS).ResultsThe Argentina Hyposmia Rating Scale (AHRS) scores of patients in DIP group were markedly higher than those in PD patients group. Compared with the NC group, the FA values in the genu and body of the corpus callosum (CC), anterior limb of the right internal capsule, bilateral anterior corona radiata, bilateral superior corona radiata, right external capsule, and right superior fronto-occipital fasciculus (could be a part of the anterior internal capsule) were significantly decreased in the DIP group; however, no significant cluster was found in MD.ConclusionsThe present study provides novel insights into the alterations in WM microstructure among DIP patients, suggesting that these methodologies have the potential to aid in the early diagnosis and treatment of DIP.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.