Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
ObjectivesInitial deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming using a monopolar review is time-consuming, subjective, and burdensome. Incorporating neurophysiology has the potential to expedite, objectify, and automatize initial DBS programming. We aimed to assess the feasibility and performance of clinically implemented sensing-based initial DBS programming for Parkinson's disease (PD).Materials and methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective study in 15 patients with PD (25 hemispheres) implanted with a sensing-enabled neurostimulator in whom initial subthalamic nucleus/globus pallidus pars interna DBS programming was guided by beta power in real-time local field potential recordings, instead of a monopolar review.ResultsThe initial sensing-based programming visit lasted on average 42.2 minutes (SD 18) per hemisphere. During the DBS optimization phase, a conventional monopolar clinical review was not required in any patients. The initial stimulation contact level remained the same at the final follow-up visit in all hemispheres except three. The final amplitude was on average 0.8 mA (SD 0.9) higher than initially set after the original sensing-based programming visit. One year after surgery, off-medication International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) III total score, tremor subscore, MDS-UPDRS IV, and levodopa-equivalent dose improved by 47.0% (p ConclusionsThis study shows that sensing-based initial DBS programming for PD is feasible and rapid, and selected clinically effective contacts in most patients, including those with tremor. Technologic innovations and practical developments could improve sensing-based programming.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.