Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Neurodegenerative disorders (NDDs) have been prevalent for more than a decade, and the number of individuals affected per year has increased exponentially. Among these NDDs, Alzheimer's disease, which causes extreme cognitive impairment, and Parkinson's disease, characterized by impairments in motor activity, are the most prevalent. While few treatments are available for clinical practice, they have minimal effects on reversing the neurodegeneration associated with these debilitating diseases. Lifestyle modifications and dietary choices are emerging and promising approaches to combat these disorders. Of the lifestyle changes that one could adopt, a major habit is caloric restriction. Caloric restriction (CR) is a lifestyle modification in which the amount of calories ingested is reduced to a significant amount without resulting in malnutrition. However, maintaining such a lifestyle is challenging. As alternatives, certain compounds have been recognized to mimic the effects produced by CR. These compounds are called caloric restriction mimetics (CRMs). Among these compounds, some have been designated established CRMs, namely, resveratrol, metformin, and rapamycin, whereas several other candidates are termed potential CRMs because of a lack of conclusive evidence of their effects. The potential CRMs discussed in this review are quercetin, chrysin, astragalin, apigenin, curcumin, epigallocatechin-3-gallate, and NAD+ precursors. This review aims to provide an overview of these CRMs' effectiveness in preventing neurodegenerative disorders associated with aging. Moreover, we highlight the clinical relevance of these compounds by discussing in detail the results of clinical trials on them.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.