Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Background and purposePhysical activity has beneficial symptomatic effects for people with Parkinson's disease (PD), but increasing-and sustaining-a physically active lifestyle remains challenging. We investigated the feasibility (ability to increase step counts) and usability of a behavioral intervention using a motivational smartphone application to remotely increase physical activity in PD.MethodsWe performed a 4-week, double-blind pilot trial. Thirty people with PD who were able to walk independently and did not take more than 7000 steps at baseline were randomized to minimal, moderate, or large increases in step counts. Step counts were continuously collected with the participants' own smartphones. Usability was assessed with a translated version of the System Usability Scale. We reported the distribution of clinical characteristics in our participants.ResultsStep counts per day increased over 4 weeks in a dose-dependent pattern (mean ± standard deviation: minimal = 1064 ± 1030, moderate = 1689 ± 2060, large = 2745 ± 3817). The usability of the STEPWISE app (System Usability Scale) was perceived as excellent (mean ± standard deviation: 86.6 ± 12.7).Discussion and conclusionsOur findings support the notion that a titrated increase in daily step count is feasible over 4 weeks. This motivates and supports further development of a smartphone application to increase physical activity in people with manifest PD. If effective, this behavioral intervention could provide an accessible option for people with PD worldwide.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A516 ).
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.