Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
IntroductionPrasinezumab was shown to potentially delay motor progression in individuals with early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) who were either treatment-naïve or on monoamine oxidase type B inhibitor (MAO-Bi) therapy in the PASADENA study. We report the rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics of the PADOVA study, designed to evaluate prasinezumab in an early-stage PD population receiving standard-of-care (SOC) symptomatic medications.MethodsPADOVA (NCT04777331) is a Phase 2b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, in which individuals with early-stage PD on SOC stable symptomatic monotherapy (levodopa or MAO-Bi) receive intravenous prasinezumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint is time to confirmed motor progression, defined as ≥5 points increase from baseline on the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III in practically defined OFF-medication state.Results586 participants were enrolled between May 5th, 2021 and March 22nd, 2023. At baseline, 74.2 % and 25.8 % of participants were receiving levodopa and MAO-Bi, respectively. Mean age was 64.2 years and 63.5 % were male. Mean time from diagnosis was 18.6 months, 85 % of participants were in Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) Stage 2, and mean MDS-UPDRS Part III score was 24.5. Compared with the PASADENA population, PADOVA participants were older (∼5 years), with longer disease duration (∼8 months), and slightly more advanced based on H&Y stage (10 % more in Stage 2) and MDS-UPDRS Part III (∼3 points more).ConclusionsPADOVA has successfully recruited an early-stage PD population to test the effect of prasinezumab when added to background SOC.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.