SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Pathogenic Variant in the 5'-Untranslated Region of <i>GCH1</i> and Clinical Heterogeneity in a Chinese Family with Dopa-Responsive Dystonia.

Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) · 2025-01-07

DOI: 10.5334/tohm.974PMID: 39801809

Open accessbrief-report; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal Article; Case ReportsOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundVariants in the GCH1 gene, encoding guanosine triphosphate cyclohydrolase, are associated with dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD) and are considered risk factors for parkinson's disease.MethodsComprehensive neurological assessments documented motor and non-motor symptoms in a Chinese family affected by DRD. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was employed to identify potential mutations, with key variants confirmed by Sanger sequencing and analyzed for familial co-segregation.ResultsThe proband, a 50-year-old woman with a 10-year history of limb rigidity, abnormal posture, and a 23-year history of neck deviation, showed significant symptom improvement with levodopa treatment. Family evaluation revealed similar motor symptoms in four additional affected members, all responding well to levodopa. WES identified a GCH1 variant (NM_000161.3: c.-22C > T) in the 5'-untranslated region (5' UTR) in four symptomatic individuals (excluding deceased II-3). This variant likely affects translation by introducing an upstream initiation codon and open reading frame (uORF), leading to decreased BH4 levels and disrupted dopamine synthesis.DiscussionThis study reports a pathogenic variant in the 5' UTR of GCH1 in a family with DRD, underscoring the phenotypic heterogeneity associated with this locus.HighlightsA non-coding variant (c.-22C > T) in the 5' UTR of the GCH1 gene is identified in a Chinese family with DRD.The findings reveal significant clinical heterogeneity within the family, highlighting the complex genotype-phenotype relationship.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.