SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Drug-induced Parkinson-like events: a real-world study from 2004 to the first quarter of 2024 based on FAERS.

Front Pharmacol · 2025-01-03

DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1529260PMID: 39830347

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundTimely identification of drug-induced Parkinson-like events is essential to improve clinical management and enhance patients' quality of life. However, there is a significant lack of studies addressing these events in real-world settings.MethodsTo bridge this gap, we analyzed adverse event (AE) reports related to Parkinson-like events from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2024. Our objective was to summarize a list of potential drugs at high risk for Parkinson-like events and their corresponding proportions of AE reports.ResultsAs a result, a total of 54,639 AE reports linked to Parkinson-like events involving 1,224 drugs were identified. Among these, carbidopa/levodopa exhibited the highest number of reports, followed by baclofen and pimavanserin. The most frequently reported drug class was antiparkinsonian drugs and psycholeptics, followed by psychoanaleptics. Using two disproportionate analysis methods, the reporting odds ratio and proportional reporting ratio, we found that 136 drugs exhibited positive results in both methods, while 1,063 drugs did not show any positive signals.ConclusionThis study provides a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of drugs associated with Parkinson-like events, aiming to promote rational drug use and inform clinical practice.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.