The class-IIa HDAC inhibitor TMP269 promotes BMP-Smad signalling and is neuroprotective in in vitro and in vivo 6-hydroxydopamine models of

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Degeneration of midbrain nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons is a pathological hallmark of Parkinson's disease (PD). Peripheral delivery of a compound(s) to arrest or slow this dopaminergic degeneration is a key therapeutic goal. Pan-inhibitors of histone deacetylase (HDAC) enzymes, key epigenetic regulators, have shown therapeutic promise in PD models. However as there are several classes of HDACs (ClassI-IV), class-specific inhibition will be important to ensure target specificity. Here we examine the neuroprotective potential of the Class-IIa HDAC inhibitor, TMP269. We show that TMP269 protected against 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced neurite injury in SH-SY5Y cells and cultured rat ventral mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons. We find that TMP269 upregulated the neurotrophic factor BMP2 and BMP-Smad dependent transcription signalling in SH-SY5Y cells, which was necessary for its neuroprotective effect against 6-OHDA-induced injury. Furthermore, peripheral continuous infusion of 0.5 mg/kg of TMP269 for 7 days via a mini-osmotic pump, reduced forelimb impairments induced by striatal 6-OHDA administration. TMP269 also protected dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and their striatal terminals from striatal 6-OHDA-induced neurodegeneration and prevented the 6-OHDA-induced increases in the numbers of IBA1-positive microglia in the striatum and substantia nigra in vivo. TMP269 also prevented 6-OHDA-induced decreases in BMP2, pSmad1/5 and acetylated histone 3 levels, and it reversed 6-OHDA-induced increase in nuclear HDAC5 in dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. These data add to the growing body of evidence that Class-IIa specific HDAC inhibitors may be pharmacological agents of interest for peripheral delivery with the goal of neuroprotection in PD.

Scientific assessment

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.