SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

VDAC1: A Key Player in the Mitochondrial Landscape of Neurodegeneration.

Biomolecules · 2024-12-30

DOI: 10.3390/biom15010033PMID: 39858428

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; review-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel 1 (VDAC1) is a mitochondrial outer membrane protein that plays a crucial role in regulating cellular energy metabolism and apoptosis by mediating the exchange of ions and metabolites between mitochondria and the cytosol. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress are central features of neurodegenerative diseases. The pivotal functions of VDAC1 in controlling mitochondrial membrane permeability, regulating calcium balance, and facilitating programmed cell death pathways, position it as a key determinant in the delicate balance between neuronal viability and degeneration. Accordingly, increasing evidence suggests that VDAC1 is implicated in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and others. This review summarizes the current findings on the contribution of VDAC1 to neurodegeneration, focusing on its interactions with disease-specific proteins, such as amyloid-β, α-synuclein, and mutant SOD1. By unraveling the complex involvement of VDAC1 in neurodegenerative processes, this review highlights potential avenues for future research and drug development aimed at alleviating mitochondrial-related neurodegeneration.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.