SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The roles of intrinsically disordered proteins in neurodegeneration.

Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj · 2025-02-13

DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2025.130772PMID: 39954969

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neurodegenerative diseases such as Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and Huntington's disease share a common pathological hallmark: the accumulation of misfolded proteins, particularly involving intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) like TDP-43, FUS, Tau, α-synuclein, and Huntingtin. These proteins undergo pathological aggregation, forming toxic inclusions that disrupt cellular function. The dysregulation of proteostasis mechanisms, including the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), ubiquitin-independent proteasome system (UIPS), autophagy, and molecular chaperones, exacerbates these proteinopathies by failing to clear misfolded proteins effectively. Emerging therapeutic strategies aim to restore proteostasis through proteasome activators, autophagy enhancers, and chaperone-based interventions to prevent the toxic accumulation of IDPs. Additionally, understanding liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and its role in stress granule dynamics offers novel insights into how aberrant phase transitions contribute to neurodegeneration. By targeting the molecular pathways involved in IDP aggregation and proteostasis regulation, and better understanding the specificity of each component, research in this area will pave the way for innovative therapeutic approaches to combat these neurodegenerative diseases. This review discusses the molecular mechanisms underpinning IDP pathology, highlights recent advancements in drug discovery, and explores the potential of targeting proteostasis machinery to develop effective therapies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.