Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
IntroductionSurgical device-aided therapies (DATs), including carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension (CLES) and deep brain stimulation (DBS), are efficacious treatment options for people with advanced Parkinson's disease (aPD). While provider and patient preference influence treatment choices, DAT use remains low and social drivers of health (SDOH) may present barriers to access. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of patient characteristics and SDOH-including geographic distance to facilities that provide DATs-with likelihood of receiving DAT.MethodsAdults diagnosed with PD and meeting aPD clinical indicators were identified among 100 % Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries linked to Inovalon's SDOH data warehouse between 01/01/2018-12/31/2020. Multivariate logistic regression models determined factors associated with DAT vs no-DAT initiation.ResultsOf 503,245 Medicare beneficiaries with PD, 22 % met proxy criteria for aPD, with 2 % (2450) receiving DAT (CLES 24 %; DBS 76 %). Nationwide aPD prevalence was 309 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries. There were 413 DAT facilities nationwide (average 8 facilities/state), and aPD patients traveled 98 miles on average to a facility (range 11-255 miles). aPD patients under age 75 were 2-3x more likely to receive DAT, while those identifying as female, Black race, have moderate to severe comorbidity, and lower household incomes were less likely to receive DAT.ConclusionsFindings suggest low utilization of DATs among US Medicare beneficiaries with aPD. Even states with more DAT facilities often require patients to travel long distances. Identifying and minimizing access disparities, particularly for women, racial minorities, and people with low socioeconomic status may improve DAT utilization and outcomes for patients with aPD.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.