SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Aging, cellular senescence and Parkinson's disease.

J Parkinsons Dis · 2025-02-02

DOI: 10.1177/1877718x251316552PMID: 39973488

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; review-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the most common neurodegenerative movement disorder, affecting 1-2% of people over age 65. The risk of developing PD dramatically increases with advanced age, indicating that aging is likely a driving factor in PD neuropathogenesis. Several age-associated biological changes are also hallmarks of PD neuropathology, including mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. Accumulation of senescent cells is an important feature of aging that contributes to age-related diseases. How age-related cellular senescence affects brain health and whether this phenomenon contributes to neuropathogenesis in PD is not yet fully understood. In this review, we highlight hallmarks of aging, including mitochondrial dysfunction, loss of proteostasis, genomic instability and telomere attrition in relation to well established PD neuropathological pathways. We then discuss the hallmarks of cellular senescence in the context of neuroscience and review studies that directly examine cellular senescence in PD. Studying senescence in PD presents challenges and holds promise for advancing our understanding of disease mechanisms, which could contribute to the development of effective disease-modifying therapeutics. Targeting senescent cells or modulating the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) in PD requires a comprehensive understanding of the complex relationship between PD pathogenesis and cellular senescence.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.