SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

A network perspective on cognition in individuals with Parkinson's disease.

Alzheimers Dement (Amst) · 2025-01-01

DOI: 10.1002/dad2.70091PMID: 39996032

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionIn neuropsychological diagnostics, the assignment of cognitive tests to domains is usually not empirically based. Hence, we aimed to assess the dimensionality structure of cognition in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) and conceptually replicate the findings in cognitively healthy individuals (CHIs).MethodsWe performed Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) for dimensionality analysis of cognitive test scores in N = 698 individuals with PD from the DEMPARK/LANDSCAPE study. Redundancy was reduced based on Unique Variable Analysis (UVA) before re-performing EGA. CHI data (N = 60,398) served as a conceptual replication base.ResultsEGA identified five dimensions. After removing redundancy identified by UVA, EGA identified a unidimensional structure of cognitive test scores. The findings were conceptually replicated in CHIs.DiscussionThe findings imply the need to re-evaluate the composition of cognitive test batteries to reduce redundancy and improve the validity of cognitive diagnostics. Cognition may be better described as a network of interrelated cognitive functions rather than a factorial structure of latent cognitive domains.HighlightsCognitive test scores of the same paradigm were strongly associated with each other.This finding indicates redundancy in the cognitive test battery.After removing redundancy, scores were best represented by unidimensional structures.The findings in Parkinson's disease were conceptually replicated in healthy controls.The results suggest that cognition should be viewed as a complex "network" of interrelated functions.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.