SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Current amyloid inhibitors: Therapeutic applications and nanomaterial-based innovations.

Prog Neurobiol · 2025-02-28

DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2025.102734PMID: 40024279

Check source for accessReview; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Amyloid proteins have long been in the spotlight for being involved in many degenerative diseases including Alzheimer´s, Parkinson´s or type 2 diabetes, which currently cannot be prevented and for which there is no effective treatment or cure. Here we provide a comprehensive review of inhibitors that act directly on the amyloidogenic pathway (at the monomer, oligomer or fibril level) of key pathological amyloids, focusing on the most representative amyloid-related diseases. We discuss the latest advances in preclinical and clinical trials, focusing on cutting-edge developments, particularly on nanomaterials-based inhibitors, which offer unprecedented opportunities to address the complexity of protein misfolding disorders and are revolutionizing the landscape of anti-amyloid therapeutics. Notably, nanomaterials are impacting critical areas such as bioavailability, penetrability and functionality of compounds currently used in biomedicine, paving the way for more specific therapeutic solutions tailored to various amyloid-related diseases. Finally, we highlight the window of opportunity opened by comparative analysis with so-called functional amyloids for the development of innovative therapeutic approaches for these devastating diseases.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.