SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Long-Term Quality of Life Trend after Subthalamic Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mov Disord Clin Pract · 2025-03-05

DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.70025PMID: 40042113

Open accessMeta-Analysis; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Systematic Review; review-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundDeep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is a well-established treatment for Parkinson's Disease (PD). However, the long-term trajectory of Quality of Life (QoL) following STN-DBS remains underexplored.ObjectivesWe aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess QoL trends up to five years after STN-DBS.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to August 2024 for studies involving PD patients treated with bilateral STN-DBS, evaluating QoL using the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ), with a minimum follow-up of 12 months post-surgery. Continuous outcomes were pooled using standardized mean differences (SMD), and statistical analyses were conducted using R version 4.3.2.ResultsOut of 4106 screened articles, 42 studies with a total of 2767 patients were included in the meta-analysis. QoL improvements were observed up to 36 months post-surgery (SMD 0.83; 95% CI 0.29 to 1.37), followed by a decline to pre-operative levels at 60 months (SMD -0.06; 95% CI -0.26 to 0.15). Subdomain analysis at 60 months revealed significant deterioration in cognitive function and communication. Meta-regression indicated that QoL improvements were independent of clinical and sociodemographic factors such as age, sex, and disease duration; however, there was a correlation with mean baseline PDQ (P = 0.01).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis provides long-term QoL trends following STN-DBS, highlighting a further need to explore the factors driving the decline in QoL and develop strategies to mitigate this deterioration.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.